Ads By Google.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Chinese Yuan as Reserve Currency

Chinese Yuan as Reserve Currency

Even before the sovereign debt crisis in Europe damped confidence in the world’s second most important reserve currency, the Chinese Yuan was on the cusp of being accepted as a global reserve currency.
We’re all familiar with the arguments attacking the Yuan in this context: its currency is pegged, its capital controls are rigid, and its capital markets are shallow and illiquid. Say what you want about the world’s major currencies (volatile, debt-ridden, etc.), but at least none of these factors applies, goes this line of thinking. With the Euro’s future up in the air, however, a potential hole has been created in Central Banks’ respective forex reserves. As replacement(s) for the Euro are sought, such long-held assumptions are being challenged.
The Chinese Yuan is attractive for a number of reasons. First, investors and Central Banks want exposure to China’s economy; its average annual growth rate of 10% over the last 30 years is far-and-away the highest in the world. “China’s economic output will be more than $5 trillion, or around 9% of the world’s economy, according to the International Monetary Fund.” Second, the fact that the RMB is fixed is in some ways a perk: the wild fluctuations that most currencies witnessed as a result of the credit crisis has made some wonder if market-determined exchange rates aren’t overrated. Finally, the widespread consensus is that the RMB will appreciate anyway, so holding it seems like a safe bet.
Therefore, “Central banks or sovereign wealth funds from Malaysia, Norway and Singapore have received special quotas from the Chinese government to allow them to gain a bit of exposure to China’s currency. The bet is that holding yuan-denominated assets is an important feature of a diversified national reserve.” In addition, China has signed Yuan-denominated swap agreements with a handful of its most important trade partners, totaling $100 Billion over the last year.
Still, these are small-scale agreements, and Central Banks are really just testing the waters. According to a recent study by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), “The Chinese yuan is ‘far from ready’ to gain reserve currency status. Rather, it said China’s yuan was likely first to become a regional currency as trade links with its neighbours expand.” The main issue is not one of stability, but rather of supply. Simply, there are not enough liquid, attractive investments, denominated in RMB. China’s stock and bond markets are filled with unreliable companies, whose primary loyalty is to the State, rather than to investors. Buying Chinese government bonds seems like a safe option, but given, that China finances most of its spending with cash, such bonds are not widely available.
For now, the Chinese Yuan will remain most attractive (from the standpoint of a reserve currency) to regional trade partners, because such countries have a genuine use for RMB. Investors seem to understand this idea, and are using the currencies of such countries to bet indirectly on the RMB. According to one analyst, “On days when trading is especially volatile, the Singapore dollar moves in tandem with the yuan bets. The Malaysian ringgit, Taiwanese dollar and Korean won are also high on the list of currencies affected by the yuan.” In short, the RBI’s assessment of the Yuan seems pretty apt. It will probably be at least a decade before holding the Yuan is as viable (not to say attractive) as the Japanese Yen. For investors who don’t want to wait that long, there are a handful of other regional currencies that they can hold in the interim.
The China Effect

“Risk-On, Risk-Off”

 

It sounds like a play on words, based on the Karate Kid refrain, Wax-On Wax Off, and for all I know it was. Still, I rather like this characterization – coined by a research team at HSBC – of the markets current performance. Moreover, you’ll notice from the placement of that apostrophe that I’m not just talking about forex markets, but about the financial markets in general.
What we mean is that when risk appetite is high, credit markets and equities and high-yielding currencies tend to rally together. When risk appetite fades, “those assets fall and government bonds and safe-haven currencies, including the U.S. dollar, the Swiss franc and, in particular, the Japanese yen rally.” Data from Bloomberg News confirms this phenomenon: “The 120-day negative correlation between Intercontinental Exchange Inc.’s Dollar Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index was at 42.4 percent today, and has been mostly above 40 percent since June 2009.”
Skeptics counter that this correlation is tautological. Anyone can point to a stock market rally and declare that “Risk is Back On.” In addition, it’s not wholly unsurprising that there are strong correlations between low-risk currencies and low-risk assets, and between high-risk currencies and high-risk assets. According to HSBC, however, this time is different.
US Dollar Versus S&P
For example, models suggest that the recent decline in volatility should have caused these relationships to break down. That they defied predictions and remained strong suggests that we have witnessed a significant paradigm shift. In the past, “Rising correlations are also tied to weak macroeconomic conditions.” At the moment, this could hardly be more true, with global economic growth flagging.
Statisticians love to teach the dictum, Correlation does not imply causation. Nonetheless, I think that in this case, I’d wager to say that the equity and credit/bond markets are driving forex, rather than the other way around. Consider as evidence that, “[Retail] Investors withdrew a staggering $33.12 billion from domestic stock market mutual funds in the first seven months of this year,” and shifted this capital into bonds. While this wouldn’t in itself be enough to drive the Dollar higher, it epitomizes the steady shifts that have been taking place in capital markets for nearly a year, broken only by the S&P/Euro rally in the spring (which now appears to have been an aberration).
Investors Shift Money from Stocks to Bonds
In fact, these shifts are once again creating shortages of Dollars: “This week, two banks bid at the European Central Bank’s weekly dollar liquidity providing auction – the first time there have been any bids since May – suggesting that they could not raise dollars in the market.” This suggests that demand for the Dollar could continue to grow.
Some analysts have suggested that the low-yielding US Dollar is already on its way to becoming a funding currency for carry traders, but I think this is wishful thinking. The HSBC report supports this conclusion, “A weakening of the ‘risk on-risk off’ paradigm is likely only once macro conditions are improved in a sustainable way…Currency performance will likely be tied to the ebb and flow of the perception of risk for some months to come.” In short, until there is solid proof that the global economy has emerged from recession (even if ironically it is the US which is leading the pack downward), the Dollar will probably remain strong.

Emerging Market Currencies Flat in 2010

Emerging Market Currencies Flat in 2010

The recovery that emerging markets (their economies and financial markets) have staged since the lows of 2008 is impressive. In most corners of the financial markets, all of the losses have been erased, and securities/currencies are trading only slightly below there pre-credit crisis levels. Even compared to twelve months ago, in 2009, the performance of emerging market currencies holds up well. In the year-to-date, however, most of these currencies have appreciated only slightly, thanks to a particularly weak month of August.
Emerging Market Currencies
The MSCI emerging market stock index is currently down 2.5% since the start of the year. You can see from the chart above that most emerging market currencies tend to track this index pretty closely, rising and falling on the same days as the index. Interestingly, emerging market stocks appear to be much more volatile than emerging market currencies. You can also see that while the Malaysian RInggit has started to separate itself from the pack, the others have moved in lockstep with each other and are all about even for the year.
On the other hand, emerging market debt – as proxied by the JP Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index (EMBI+) has been unbelievably strong. Prior to the slight correction in the last couple weeks, the index has risen a whopping 20% over the last twelve months. On the surface, this disconnect between stocks and bonds would seem to be an anomaly, or even a contradiction. After all, if investors are only lukewarm about emerging market currencies and stocks, what reason would there be for them to get so excited about bonds.
jp morgan embi+ 2010
If you drill a little deeper, however, it all starts to make sense. Due to a weak appetite for risk, 2010 has been a favorable year for bonds, at the expense of stocks. I would have assumed that poor risk appetite would also have helped G7 financial markets, at the expense of the emerging markets, but you can see from the chart below (which shows the MSCI emerging markets stock index closely tracking the S&P 500) that this simply isn’t the case. On the contrary, this same dynamic is playing out simultaneously in emerging markets. “Today, we are favoring emerging-market debt over emerging-market equities because the debt provides us with a better risk-adjusted return,” summarized one portfolio manager.
S&P 500 versus MSCI emerging markets 2010
When it comes to debt, emerging markets have actually outperformed G7 debt, in spite of the current risk-averse climate. “Funds investing in emerging-market local-currency debt have attracted $16.9 billion of net inflows so far, more than triple the record annual intake of $5 billion recorded in 2007.” The logical basis for this shift is surprisingly straightforward: “When we look at government debt, we’re always comparing and contrasting the yields versus the fundamentals. I just don’t know why you would want those low yields from a Treasury bond in the developed world when you can get much higher yields — and in our estimation, an improving economic story — in Indonesia, Malaysia or Brazil.”
In other words, why would you want to earn 2.65% from a country (US) whose national debt is close to 100% of GDP, when you could earn double or triple that rate from investing in the sovereign debt of countries whose Debt-to-GDP ratios are sustainable?!  In addition, when it comes to investing in debt, the lack of volatility in emerging market currencies can bee seen as a plus, since it prevents the interest rates from becoming diluted. To be fair, fundamentals don’t represent the whole story: “After 2008, you really have to take liquidity into consideration. Emerging markets are going to be some of the first to freeze up in a crisis.”
Government Bond Yields Inflation 2010
In fact, some analysts are already starting to question whether the markets haven’t gotten ahead of themselves in this regard, and that perhaps we are due for a big correction: “Come September, when trading resumes in earnest, we’ll find out if the cozy emerging markets world we have experienced over the past few months was summer laziness or strong conviction.” With vacations ending and traders set to return to their desks, we won’t have to wait long to find out.

CFTC Passes New Retail Forex Guidelines

CFTC Passes New Retail Forex Guidelines

I have been covering the US Commodity Future Trading Commission’s (CFTC) efforts to revamp the regulatory structure that governs forex, since it was unveiled earlier this year. On August 30, the CFTC formally published the “final regulations concerning off-exchange retail foreign currency transactions. The rules implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, which, together, provide the CFTC with broad authority to register and regulate entities wishing to serve as counterparties to, or to intermediate, retail foreign exchange (forex) transactions.”
Not only has the CFTC clearly established its authority to be the primary regulator of retail forex, but it has also laid out specific regulations. Chief among them is limiting leverage to 50:1 for major currency pairs, and 20:1 for “other retail forex transactions.” [It's not presently clear which specific currency pairs will be classified as major].  Remember that the original proposal (which, along with my endorsement, generated vehement protest) called for a decline in leverage to 10:1. Due to negative feedback from traders and brokerages, which ascribed malicious political motives to the changes and argued that it would move the entire industry offshore, the CFTC backed down and implemented only a modest decline in leverage. However, it’s important to note that the National Futures Association (NFA) as well as individual brokers will have discretionary power in setting leverage limits lower than 50:1. There will undoubtedly still be some opposition from traders, but I think we can all agree that the new rule represents a fair compromise.
As for the claim that traders would/will move their accounts offshore, this will become largely moot, since all brokerages, regardless of nationality, will be required to register with the CFTC and subject to its rules/oversight. Of course, those traders that are so inclined will still find a way to circumvent the rules by shifting funds “illegally” to unregistered brokers, but they do so at their own risk and will have no recourse in the event of fraud. As Forbes noted, “It seems these new rules will put a stop to Americans trading retail forex offshore to evade CFTC rules. That trend picked up the pace in recent years and it may need to be reversed quickly.”
Brokerages must register as either futures commission merchants (FCMs) or retail foreign exchange dealers (RFEDs).  These institutions will be required to “maintain net capital of $20 million plus 5 percent of the amount, if any, by which liabilities to retail forex customers exceed $10 million.” While this rule will raise the barriers to entry for potential forex start-up brokerages, it will protect consumers against broker bankruptcy. In addition, “Persons who solicit orders, exercise discretionary trading authority or operate pools with respect to retail forex also will be required to register, either as introducing brokers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators (as appropriate) or as associated persons of such entities.”
One final rule change worth noting is quite interesting: brokerages must “disclose on a quarterly basis the percentage of non-discretionary accounts that realized a profit and to keep and make available records of that calculation.” This calculation will be useful both in and of itself, and also in identifying any significant discrepancies between competing brokers. For the first time, we will be able to see whether forex trading is currently profitable (i.e. whether those that profit are in the majority or minority) and whether/how this profitability metric changes over time, in response to particular market conditions.
The new rules go into effect on October 18.

The Trend is Your Friend

Raise your hand if you’ve ever heard that expression before? Well, now there’s proof that this well-worn phrase is more than just a pointless platitude: “Royal Bank of Scotland Group indexes that track the performance of four of the most popular currency strategies show that the so-called trend style was the best-performing method, returning 7.3 percent this year through August.”
“Trend-Style” trading is also known as trend-following, and is just as it sounds. Traders identify one-way patterns in specific currency pair(s), and attempt to ride them for as long as possible. Given all of the big movements in currency markets this year, it’s no wonder that trend-following is the most popular. If you look at the 52 week trading ranges for the six most popular USD currency pairs, you can see that highs and lows are often as far as 20% apart. The EUR/USD pair, for example, fell 20% over a mere 7 months. Anyone who sold in December 2009 and bought to cover in June 2010 would have earned an annualized return of 35% without leverage! Even if you had captured only a couple months of depreciation would have yielded impressive returns. In addition, you could have traded the Euro back up from June until August and reaped a 60% annualized return. Best of all, both of these trends (down, then up) unfolded very smoothly, with only minor corrections along the way.
The Trend is Your Friend- USD/EURI’m sure serious technical analysts are rolling their eyes at the chart above, but the point stands that trend-following has never been easier and rarely more profitable than it is now. One fund manager summarized, “Trend-following investors are capturing the momentum in several big currency moves. You have so much uncertainty in the world now with regard to inflation or deflation, which typically makes currency markets and interest rates move. That is good for trend followers as it causes volatility, which typically creates good profits.” In other words, there is a tremendous amount happening in forex markets at the moment, and this is reflected in protracted, deep moves in currency pairs, which can change direction without notice and yet continue moving the opposite way for just as long. If you think this sounds obvious, look at historical data (5-10 years) for the majority of currency pairs: while trends have always been abundant, it was only recently that they began to last longer and became more pronounced.
The other three strategies surveyed by the Royal Scotland Group (”RSG”) were the Carry Trade, Value Trade, and Volatility Trade. Unfortunately, data was only offered for the carry trade strategy (confusingly referred to by RSG as the volatility strategy), which is down 5.9% in the year-to-date. The carry trade strategy involves selling a currency with a low yield and favor of one with a high yield, and profiting from the interest rate spread. In order for this strategy to be profitable, however, the long currency must either appreciate or remain constant. Thus, when volatility is high – as it has been over the last 2-3 years – this is a losing strategy.
We can only guess that a true volatility strategy probably would have been the second most profitable strategy. This strategy can be implemented through the use of long and short spot positions, as well as through trading in options and other derivatives. As I said, there is no shortage of volatility at the moment: “Since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, the dollar has seen record volatility against the euro…including six moves of at least 10%.” For traders that profit from volatility, the current uncertainty has created a windfall situation.
Volatility 2006-2010
However, it has made value trading – based on fundamentals and the notion of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) – risky and unpopular: “The volatility also has made what would appear to be a straightforward bet against the dollar fraught with risk. Three factors tend to move currencies: the pace of growth, debt levels and interest rates. By those standards, the dollar should be falling against the currencies of emerging-market and commodity-producing nations.” Not only is this not the case (a decline in risk appetite has turned the Dollar into a safe-haven), but even betting on a protracted Dollar decline is itself risky because of surging volatility. One way around this is to trade a Dollar Index (by way of an ETF, for example) which is inherently less volatile (half as volatile, to be exact) than individual currency pairs.
That’s not to say that value trading isn’t profitable over the long-term. “Empirical evidence suggests that currencies…show a tendency to revert back toward PPP in the longer run.” Given current volatility/uncertainty, however, this strategy is unlikely to be profitable in the short run. Fortunately, uncertainty doesn’t negate opportunity, and traders should plot strategy accordingly.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

US Dollar: Same Old Story

US Dollar: Same Old Story

These days, it’s hard to offer a fresh perspective on the Dollar. The factors driving its short-term momentum – namely low interest rates and its perception as a financial safe haven – have been in place for nearly a year. It’s long-term prognosis, meanwhile, also hasn’t changed much. Since the beginning of the decade, the Greenback has been in a state of perennial decline as a result of its twin deficits and the related notion that it will be soon be replaced as the world’s pre-eminent currency.
The Falling Greenback
Since the last time I posted about the Dollar (October 6: Dollar’s Role as Reserve Currency in Jeopardy), then, there haven’t been many developments. Fears that oil will one day be priced and settled in an alternative currency – such as the Euro – continue to reverberate through the markets. Several ministers from OPEC countries have already officially dismissed such claims as baseless. A parallel debate is now taking place on the sidelines as to whether or not such a shift even matters.
Dean Baker argued in a recent article for Foreign Policy magazine, that pricing oil in Dollars represents a mere “accounting convention,” adopted by most simply by default, since the US is the cornerstone of the world economy. Argues Baker, “World oil production is a bit under 90 million barrels a day. If two-thirds of this oil is sold across national borders, then it implies a daily oil trade of 60 million barrels. If all of this oil is sold in dollars, then it means that oil consumers would have to collectively hold $4.2 billion to cover their daily oil tab.”
Unfortunately, Baker’s “simple arithmetic” is both erroneous and slightly irrelevant. Assuming a price of only $100 per barrel (pretty conservative if you believe the notion of peak oil), current consumption of 85 million barrels per day implies a daily turnover of $8.5 Billion per day, or $3+ Trillion per year. If the price doubles to $200 per barrel….well, you get the point.
Taking this line of reasoning further becomes somewhat problematic, however. First of all, while OPEC members currently hold the majority (70%+) of there reserves in Dollar-denominated assets, it’s unclear how this would change in the event that oil was no longer priced in Dollars. It’s conceivable that just as many of these Central Banks currently diversify their Dollar-denominated proceeds into other currencies, that they would “diversify” Euro-denominated proceeds back into the Dollar. Of course, it’s also conceivable that a combination of inertia and investment strategy would cause them to hold a larger portion of there reserves in Euros.
If OPEC Central banks continue to prefer Dollars, than Baker is right in arguing that the currency in which oil is priced has no implications outside of accounting. If, on the other hand, he is wrong, and a change in pricing causes/coincides with changing preferences, then the implications for the Dollar would be disastrous. [Consider that $3 Trillion/per year which is at stake currently represents more than 15% of total foreign ownership of US assets.] The problem is that we just don’t know.
Foreign-owned assets in the US
Regardless, the status quo favors the Dollar, since creating a new reserve currency would take at least a decade, if not more. For that reason, the World’s Central Banks (we’re not just talking about OPEC anymore) continue to prefer Dollars. “In the five weeks through Oct. 7, foreign central banks bought more than $48.55 billion in Treasury securities, an average of $9.71 billion per week, according to the latest data from the Federal Reserve.” In addition, “Finance Minister Hirohisa Fujii said he expects the dollar will remain the key reserve currency for some time to come.” Private foreign investors, meanwhile, are dragging their heals a bit, perhaps waiting for the Dollar to fall further before jumping in. Asks one columnist rhetorically, “Why buy now if the dollar might be even weaker in six months’ time?”
What else is new? The US budget deficit came in at $1.4 Trillion for the fiscal year, the highest level since World War II. On the bright side, the deficit was $200-400 Billion less than earlier estimates. Meanwhile, members of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors restated the unlikelihood of higher rates in the immediate future. “Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed and thought to be a rare hawk on the Fed’s Open Market Committee, chimed in that no one at the Fed thinks this is the time to raise interest rates.” Finally, the US trade deficit is once again narrowing, due in no small part to the declining Dollar.
At this point, it seems reasonable to assume that much of the bad news has already been priced into the Dollar. Sure, the Australian rate hikes came as a surprise and forced many to rethink their calculations. Investors have already begun to separate the healthy currencies from the sick (to borrow an analogy from a previous post), but that the Dollar would be grouped with the “sick” currencies has long been anticipated. Given that the currency has already fallen by double digits in 2009 and is nearing the record lows of 2008, some are wondering how long it can continue.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Liberty Reserve

Liberty Reserve


Liberty Reserve is an e-currency account-based system operated by Liberty Reserve S.A. (based in Costa Rica). It allows fast, reliable and secure transactions between the members of the system. The customers can buy and sell Liberty Reserve e-currency via authorized dealers and various exchange services.

One of the disctinctive features of Liberty Reserve that gives the system an advantage against other similar e-currencies is the privacy option. Each selected transaction within the system can optionally be made private by the account holder. Another interesting feature is the wallet-based spending, which allows creation of separate wallets apart from the main account to hold small amounts of money. These wallets have separate security details to ensure better protection of the main balance.

Since the late 2006 Liberty Reserve became one of the most popular payment method among the Forex traders from many Asian, South American and African countries, because it doesn't require credit card or bank account verification and is not strictly regulated by the authorities. Many trader-friendly Forex brokers list Liberty Reserve as one of the deposit/withdrawal option. Here is a short list of recommended Forex brokers that support Liberty Reserve:
InstaForex
FXOpen
Forex4you
MasterForex

You can also open account with Liberty Reserve for free.

Moneybookers

Moneybookers


Moneybookers is a British electronic payment, storage and money transfer system that is operated by Moneybookers Ltd., which is owned by Investcorp Technology Partners. Moneybookers was founded in 2001 and by its functionality is a competitor of other popular payment system PayPal. Like PayPal, Moneybookers doesn't offer any electronic currency, but the account balance can be uploaded and is measured in the common currency units.

Moneybookers requires mandatory account owner verification, which can be done via confirming the credit card, the bank account or the physical address. All three methods can be used together to increase the transfer limits that are active for all customers.

Moneybookers charges fees for sending the funds, which is usually quite convenient for the sellers and providers of the various paid on-line services.

Moneybookers is less popular in the world than PayPal or WebMoney, but is a convenient electronic payment system to use with the Forex brokers. It's a secure payment system that isn't anonymous and complies with the British anti-fraud laws. Unlike PayPal, Moneybookers is fully available to the residents of almost all countries in the world, making it potentially more widespread system.

Here is the short list of the Forex brokers that accept Moneybookers:
LiteForex
AvaFX
InstaForex

PayPal

PayPal


PayPal is an electronic payment, storage and money transfer method that is operated by PayPal Inc., which is owned by eBay Inc. Founded in 2000 PayPal was one of the first and currently is one of the most popular on-line services for money transferring. Although there is account balance associated with each PayPal account, PayPal doesn't employ virtual currency units (unlike e-gold and WebMoney), remaining a pure payment system.

PayPal accounts are anonymous and are based on the customer's e-mail address. But the credit card is required to add the funds into the balance or send payments to other customers.

PayPal charges fees for receiving funds and for withdrawing funds from the account balance to the bank accounts outside U.S. The sender of the funds doesn't pay any fees if transfer occurs only inside the payment system.

PayPal is a convenient electronic payment system to use with the Forex brokers. Because all payments are instant, you can use your credit card without exposing it to anyone except PayPal and there are enough various brokers that accept PayPal for funding purposes. Unfortunately, PayPal doesn't allow residents of certain countries (the majority of the countries) to accept PayPal payments, making it useless to the Forex traders from such countries.

Here is the short list of the Forex brokers that accept PayPal:
AvaFX
InstaForex
Easy-Forex

To open account with PayPal, please go to http://www.paypal.com.

WebMoney

WebMoney


WebMoney is an electronic currency system operated by WM Transfer Ltd. There are several e-currencies circulating in this system, with the most popular being - WMZ (equals to $1 U.S.), WME (equals 1 euro) and WMR (equals 1 Russian ruble).

WebMoney utilizes several methods for their customers to access system accounts - WebMoney Keeper Classic (the most secure and fully functional access with highly sophisticated software), WebMoney Keep Lite (less secure, but still protected access - via Internet browser). Other methods are available but are rarely used. WebMoney can boast more than 100 million dollars daily turnaround funds and millions customers around the world. Though, WebMoney started as a Russian payment system, it is now became an internationally popular e-currency system with a large number of representatives in all over the world and the developed deposit/withdrawal system.

WebMoney is a highly secure on-line payment system, offering security through the special protected key-files - even if your password is hacked your funds are still secure. While generic WebMoney accounts are anonymous, money withdrawal transaction involve personal identification. These ways make WebMoney far more secured than e-gold or any other on-line payment system.

WebMoney is a good alternative for those Forex traders which search for fast, secure and easy-to-use method to fund their accounts without the troublesome worries with credit cards or bank wires. Many Forex brokers support WebMoney as the deposit/withdrawal option. Here is a short list of recommended Forex brokers supporting WebMoney.
InstaForex
FXOpen
FXCast
LiteForex
Marketiva

To open account with WebMoney, please go to http://www.wmtransfer.com.

Forex VPS Hosting

Forex VPS Hosting


VPS (Virtual Private Server) hosting allows the Forex traders to use the virtual environment on the hosting company's servers to run the MetaTrader expert advisors non-stop 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The VPS is always on-line, it won't reboot during the trading week, it's not affected by the power outages and you don't need to worry about keeping your PC always on. If you want to run your expert advisors continuously without the unplanned interruptions then Forex VPS hosting for MetaTrader is what you really need. The purpose of the list presented below is to help traders in finding the best VPS hosting for MetaTrader 4 expert advisors. Here's the list of the on-line companies that offer Forex hosting service via VPS:

Sort by: Order | Basic Package Price | Traders' Rating | NameVPS Hosting Name Basic Package Price MT4 Pre-Installed Country Trial Rating
ForexVPS $35 + United States - 4.0
Crucial Paradigm A$55 + Australia - 6.8
Commercial Network Services $30 + United States - 6.8
Swvps.com $9.95 - USA and UK - 3.7
ellict $32.50 + United States + 5.9
HostEasier $35 - United States - 1.7
Gallant VPS $74.95 + United States + 5.3
eApps $11 - United States - 2.3
VPSLAND $18 - United States + 2.6
OmegaSupreme $25 + Canada - 5.3
Forex Hoster $69.95 + Slovakia - 5.5
EZForexHost $69.95 + United States - 1.4
JFOC Network Solutions $38 - United States - 2.3
Zuit $29.99 + United States - 3.9
Ultima Hosts $29 + USA, Australia and UK - 2.7


Start Trading with the Best

Risk of Loss | Privacy Statement

Risk and Reward Forex Calculator

Risk and Reward Forex Calculator


The risk and reward calculator will help you to calculate the position's best targets and their respective reward-to-risk ratios based on the Fibonacci retracements from the local peak and bottom. It's a powerful tool to determine the potential risks before entering any positions.

The price needs to be inside the wave for you to use this calculator properly. Here are the two variants of the wave you can work with — bullish and bearish:


The current price is C; A is the beginning of the wave (bottom for bullish and peak for bearish); B is the local maximum (for bullish wave) or minimum (for bearish wave).

Fibonacci retracements (0.382 and 0.618) are calculated to form the entry, target and stop-loss levels. It's better to enter positions only if the current price (C) is close to 0.382 Fibonacci level.Price A:
Price B:
Price C:


Results:0.382 Retracement:
0.618 Retracement:

1st Target:
2nd Target:
3rd Target:

Risk Reward Ratio
1st Target:
2nd Target:
3rd Target:


It's not recommended to enter a trade if your reward-to-risk ratio is less than 2.

Forex Broker Interviews

Forex Broker Interviews


Getting to know your Forex broker is very important if you want to trade with a large amount of money, or if you can't decide between two or more brokers. Interviews with the Forex brokers help to understand the broker's structure and its vision on the traders. If you are already trading actively with some broker, reading its answers on important questions will help you to get some insight on its future plans. Anyway, it is always interesting to know what some Forex broker thinks about what it is doing.

Interview with FXcast Forex Broker — my first interview with FXcast (at that time) rather new Forex broker, which is known for its no-spreads Swing trading platform and the variety of e-currencies accepted as a payment method.

Interview with FXOpen Forex Broker — questions to FXOpen head manager generally were about their rebranding, Islamic Forex trading and some other Forex related issues.

Interview with eToro — this interview is about eToro innovative Forex trading platform, which offers some of the most original ways to make money via Forex market combined with the intuitive interface.

Interview with FXCM — my first interview with such a large broker, it's mainly about various issues with FXCM, including managed accounts, Refco bankruptcy and other topics.

Interview with FxCompany — this interview with a rather new (at that time) MetaTrader broker goes about regulation, new features in trading and the competitiveness of the Forex brokers.

Interview with Azurite Markets — a rather new Forex broker with multiple-market trading services shares its view on the industry, the relations between the traders and the broker and its future plans.


If you want me to make an on-line interview with your Forex related company or site, or if you have an idea for my next interview please, use this form to contact me.

USD Slumps on Blockbuster JPM Earnings by Korman Tam

The beleaguered dollar found no reprieve in the Wednesday session, extending its losses to fresh 14-month lows against the euro and Australian dollar to 1.4934 and 0.9156, respectively. A shift to riskier assets was triggered by a stronger than expected earnings report from JP Morgan Chase, prompting advances in the US equity bourses with the Dow Jones, Nasdaq and S&P 500 all gaining by more than 1.2% by afternoon trading. The Dow Jones edged higher toward the psychologically key 10,000-level, briefly breaching above it on an intra-day basis for the first time in a year.

The economic data released earlier in the session were largely mixed, consisting of retail sales, import prices, export prices and business inventories. The headline retail sales figure was better than estimated, albeit still declining by 1.5% for September versus a 2.7% from August. The excluding automobiles retail sales figure beat consensus estimates also, posting an increase of 0.5%, better than calls for a 0.2% increase from 1.1% a month earlier. The August business inventories figure revealed a 1.5% drop from a 1.0% decline in July.

The minutes of the FOMC’s September meeting revealed that some policymakers felt increasing the scale of Fed’s asset purchases would improve the recovery, stressing the importance of ability to increase asset purchases if the economic outlook worsened. The Fed minutes said that policymakers judged costs of growth being weaker than anticipated could be relatively high while expecting inflation to remain subdued for some time amid substantial resource slack. The Fed also raised its economic projections for the second half of 2009 and subsequent years.

What Is An Exchange Rate?

What Is An Exchange Rate?

Everyday you hear something about foreign exchange markets, forex exchange rates or FX, but what is it exactly? In this article you will have some bits of information that will help you understand the meaning of Exchange Rate.
First you should understand what an exchange rate is exactly. To simplify the definition of exchange rate: this means that a rate for exchanging one currency for another. The price of the exchange rate is the currency. Like every merchandise or service it has its own price.
It means that a specific country's currency has a specific value equivalent to another currency of a country. You have to be careful of the distinct exchange rates if you travel to another country; you have to purchase the currency of that country that you are in. Lets say, you are from Germany and you travel to the United States, the exchange rate is $1.10 for 1 Euro, it means that you can purchase more than a dollar for your Euro.
If you are troubled about how much you can purchase for your currency in other country, you ought to know that one merchandise's price should theoretically remains similar, heedless to say, the currency is used to appraise its value. The cause for this is that the exchange rate is holding the value of the currency at its own degree.
There are two ways to set exchange rate. The first one is the fixed rate. Fixed rate is being maintained and fixed by the central bank of a country and it is regarded to be the authorized exchange rate for that specific country.
Level's price for the currency is being defined by comparing the price to a major currency like the US dollar or Euro. The central bank is selling and buying its own currency for keeping the exchange rate at the degree which it has been previously set.
The second way of setting the exchange rate is called the 'floating' method. This defined the exchange rate by using the balance of supply and demand for a specific currency on a private market.
This method of exchange rate is oftentimes called 'self-correcting' since the market is mechanically correcting the differences between the demand and the supply of a currency. This type of exchange rate is perpetually being altered based on the levels of the supply and demand.
Finally, no exchange rate is being defined completely on a fixed or floating method. The combination of these two settings of exchange rates is regularly used to set a specific currency's price for an exact value of the currency.

Your First Steps in Forex Trading

Your First Steps in Forex Trading

Personal loans - Apply for a secured or unsecured personal loans.
The foreign exchange, or forex, market is the biggest financial market in the whole world and thus provides plenty of opportunities for ordinary people to make money. But just like any other investment, forex trading is not an entirely fail-safe investment. You can easily lose your money if you are not skilled and careful enough to trade wisely and smartly.
Some people might tell you how easy it is to make money from forex trading. You should beware of people who make claims that you can become an instant millionaire by buying their product or service. Forex trading is not a get-rich-quick scheme so anyone who tells you otherwise can be considered a fraud.
There are no shortcuts in forex trading, although you don't need to go to school to learn how to become a forex trader. With so many forex trading courses and tutorials available on the Internet, you can educate yourself on the numerous aspects of forex trading, from determining entry and exit points down to the basic terminologies.
If you are clueless about where to start your forex trading career, you can turn to the Internet and access all the information you need. Generally, you will do fine with a simple Web search to look for any information about forex trading. But it will be easier and more convenient to choose an excellent forex website as a jump-off point to find the articles, tutorials, software, tools and other resources you need.
Once you have learned how to trade currencies, you are now ready to take the next step - the application process. This is where you apply the theories you have learned during the learning phase by using a free or demo account. To get a demo trading account, you should look for a reliable forex broker that provides the service. A demo account allows you to practice trading without risking any money on your part and is great for testing whatever forex strategy or system that you have.
How long does it take before you invest real money? The answer is as long as it takes. If you are not yet confident about your skills and strategies, stay with your demo account. Only when you have shown steady gains in paperless trading should you upgrade to a live account.
As your skill and confidence grows, you can move on to larger accounts and bigger margins, thus increasing your profit potentials. Don't be afraid of the risks because there are safeguards in place to protect your money in case of failed trades. You can maximize profits and minimize risks by using a proven, tested and effective forex trading system, which you can create on your own using available data and information.
A journey of a thousand miles begin with a single step, and that applies to forex trading. Your first step in forex trading should be looking for the right information to help you learn how to succeed as a forex trader. Once you've done that, you are already halfway to a profitable forex trading career.

Tips for Getting a Forex Broker

Trading markets have brokers that act in behalf of or mediate selling to and buying for clients. Especially so with currency or forex trading. Here are tips on how to select a forex broker.
Look for forex brokers with low spreads. Low spreads are sound forex guidelines that help the forex investor save a lot of money. A spread is how much a currency could be sold as against to how much it was bought. The difference in between is the profit of forex brokers. Thus, forex brokers don't charge or make commissions from their brokering. If kept to a minimum, forex trading is cheaper, forex traders are encouraged to invest, and forex brokers are likely to have more clients with low spreads.
Currency trading and leveraging need huge capital to maintain and balance. Thus, a good forex broker must be connected with big financial institutions like big banks and lending firms. A good forex broker must be able to play long and stable in the currency market by having enough to ride the waves of forex unpredictability. Forex brokers should also be affiliated with international financial associations like Futures Commercial Merchants (FCM), and keeping pace with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
A forex broker must be able to assist clients with tools for forex trading success. Forex traders must be updated with the latest in world currency markets and economic trends. They must be informed of the latest currency policy changes or plans in a region or major economy in the world. A forex broker must access different major trading platforms with forex charts, analysis tools, even the latest news and data---all the needed support for the success of the forex trader.
Forex brokers must be able to lend a client at the exact time and with enough funds. A forex trading lending ratio of 100:1 for instance means that a forex broker is able to lend $100 for every $1 capital invested for forex or currency trading. There are forex brokers willing to offer as high a leveraging as 250:1. Hence, it is good to choose a forex broker with a big financial back up.
The best forex broker to choose is the one that offers multi typed accounts. A forex broker must be able to make available, for instance, a small account, or a mini account, that makes $250 initial investments possible.
Thus, forex brokers must be big enough to assist forex traders in making it big in forex trading.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Wall St. Is Winning: Elizabeth Warren "Speechless" About Record Bonuses

Wall St. Is Winning: Elizabeth Warren "Speechless" About Record Bonuses

 
Elizabeth Warren, chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel, is the rare public official who doesn't mince words.But Warren admits to being "speechless" at reports of record bonuses on Wall Street.
"I do not understand how financial institutions could think they could take taxpayer money and turn around and act like it's business as usual," Warren says. "I don't understand how they can't see that the world has changed in a fundamental way - it's not business as usual. All I can say right now is they seem to be winning this argument."
In the accompanying video, taped at The Economist's Buttonwood Gathering at Pace University, I asked Warren about Treasury Secretary's claim at the same event that the government has been "remarkably effective" in combating the financial crisis.
"It is not the case people go to bed wondering if there will be an economy in the morning," she quips, but "we still have lot of serious problems."
Comparing the situation today vs. a year ago, Warren observes:
  • Even Too Bigger to Fail: A year ago the big concern was systemic risk and how to deal with 'too big to fail' firms, she recalls. Now "the big are bigger, we wiped out a lot of small folks and there's more concentration" in the banking system.
  • Still Toxic: TARP was created explicitly to remove toxic assets from bank balance sheets. "They're still there by and large."
  • Stress Test Failure: Unemployment has "blown through" the worst-case scenario in the stress test from February, Warren notes. But "we haven't repeated the stress test, or revealed any more information about what's going on inside these financial institutions."
In sum, "all the things going on [a year ago] that were serious, serious problems for the financial institutions seem to me are still serious, serious problems," she says.
Finally, Warren pulls no punches when it comes to her criticism of former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson for his failure to put any restrictions on or monitoring of the initial TARP funds, and for using the money for something other than "toxic asset relief," as originally intended.
"I have a real problem when we describe to taxpayers their money will be taken and used one way and in fact it's used another way," she declares.
So in the end, Warren did find her voice and spoke quite candidly, a very rare trait among public officials.

Ralph Nader Is Serious: "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!"

Ralph Nader Is Serious: "Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us!"

 
Ralph Nader has had an illustrious career as a consumer advocate and a controversial one as a politician. With the recent release of "Only the Super Rich Can Save Us!", Nader can now add "fiction writer" to his resume. In short, the book is about a group of super-wealthy Americans, led by Warren Buffett, who mount a counterattack against the greedy corporations and their fat-cat lobbyists who have a stranglehold on Washington D.C. and the media. Nader calls it "political science fiction" and a progressive response to Ayn Rand.
As you'll see in the accompanying clip, Nader is bringing all the passion he's displayed in other venues to promoting the book, and its message:
"It's a thrilling power collision, full of good ideas people can pick up and start thinking bigger," Nader says. "It addresses the key question: Popular forces are going nowhere in this country...even if liberals and conservatives agree on a particular issue and agenda because they don't have the money to hire the organizers, to hire the advocates to get to the media that the other, corporate side does."

BofA swings to $1 billion loss

BofA swings to $1 billion loss

  • On 10:44 am EDT, Friday October 16, 2009
By Joe Rauch
CHARLOTTE, North Carolina (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp posted a $1 billion third-quarter loss as consumer credit woes eclipsed investment banking earnings, underlining why the bank remains on a government respirator and sending its shares down 4.2 percent.
The nation's largest bank received two taxpayer bailouts totaling $45 billion after acquiring Merrill Lynch & Co and mortgage lender Countrywide at the height of the financial crisis last year. The bank says it want to start repaying the money but has not yet done so.
Credit losses on its consumer loans are eating into the bank's results as it tries to raise capital. Bank of America suffered $9.6 billion in credit losses in the third quarter, up from $4.4 billion a year earlier.
"Bank of America could continue to suffer for a while," said Malcolm Polley of Stewart Capital Advisors in Indiana, Pennsylvania.
In an ironic twist, Merrill's investment banking operations -- where massive losses in the 2008 fourth quarter triggered a storm of criticism centered on Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis -- injected an adrenaline shot to Bank of America's results in the third quarter. The unit contributed $2.2 billion in profits.
Lewis, 62, is facing multiple investigations regarding whether he disclosed enough information to shareholders before they approved the Merrill acquisition. He has said he will retire at the end of the year.
Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America reported a net loss of $1 billion, or 26 cents per share, for the third quarter, compared with net income of $1.18 billion, or 15 cents per share, in the same period last year at the height of the financial crisis.
Analysts' average forecast was a loss of 21 cents per share, according to 15 analysts polled by Thomson Reuters
I/B/E/S.
Bank of America shares were down 4 percent to $17.38 in early trading. The shares rose 29 percent during third quarter, keeping pacing with the broader KBW Banks Index, but are still down 23 percent over the past 12 months.
CREDIT WORRIES
The bank set aside $11.7 billion during the quarter for credit losses, $1.7 billion less than in the second quarter but $5.3 billion more than in the 2008 third quarter.
Losses from home equity loans and residential and commercial mortgages soared, but the worst-hit business was the credit card unit. The unit's chargeoff rate -- the proportion of loans it does not expect to be repaid -- is the highest in the nation at 14.25 percent.
Like rival JPMorgan Chase & Co, Bank of America said that while loan-loss reserves and credit losses are still high, the growth is slowing.
"Obviously, credit costs remain high, and that is our major financial challenge going forward," Lewis said in a statement.
Lewis is not receiving any compensation for 2009, after the bank bowed to pressure from the Obama administration's "pay czar," Kenneth Feinberg. Lewis may still receive a $125 million package of retirement compensation and accrued pay.
The bank's total assets slipped to $2.251 trillion in the third quarter, down about $3 billion from the second quarter.
JPMorgan on Wednesday reported a $3.6 billion third-quarter profit and said its assets grew by $15 billion in the period, to $2.041 trillion.
Like Bank of America, JPMorgan posted a big gain from banking. Citigroup Inc, the third-largest U.S. bank, on Thursday reported its third-quarter securities and banking revenue fell by a third from a year earlier.
Bank of America has been battling to raise capital to meet an expected rise in capital requirements. It said last month it had agreed to sell the long-term assets of its Columbia Management business to Ameriprise Financial Inc for about $1 billion.
Bank of America's noninterest income spiked to $14.6 billion in the third quarter from $8 billion a year earlier, due largely due to the addition of Merrill Lynch's brokerage and investment banking businesses.
(Reporting by Joe Rauch and Elinor Comlay; editing by John Wallace)